LEAFS VS ducks

Leafs 1 win
ducks 0 wins

You're swimming in troubled waters, you know that?
I can't believe that Detroit gave the win to Toronto to be sure that they won't get Tavares

I can't believe the Ducks played so poorly yesterday! Did they won the Cup 2 years ago, from the way they played, I wouldn't be able to tell!!! On another note, the Flames played even worst yesterday...

DvOLUTiON wrote:

I can't believe the Ducks played so poorly yesterday! Did they won the Cup 2 years ago, from the way they played, I wouldn't be able to tell!!! On another note, the Flames played even worst yesterday...

Bad words here: Ducks and played, in this sentence, regarding yesterday's game. On the other side, the pictures about the game should have been superb... the players had plenty of time to take them

Yeah, Vancouver 6-0 against Calgary? Can we say that the Canucks' offensive problems are solved this year? What a disaster. Can we say that the new Canucks' Captain did his job?

Uhm I wouldn,t say offensive is in check for the Canucks, they got a good game from the twins but if you look at the replays, de depth players had the plays handed to them. I think even the Flames wanted to play for the Canucks either that or Luc Bourdon haunted them and they were to scared to get in the 'Nucks way.

DvOLUTiON wrote:

Uhm I wouldn,t say offensive is in check for the Canucks, they got a good game from the twins but if you look at the replays, de depth players had the plays handed to them. I think even the Flames wanted to play for the Canucks either that or Luc Bourdon haunted them and they were to scared to get in the 'Nucks way.

You are bilingue?
At 6-0, the Canucks simply outplayed the Flames, period. An excellent game on Vancouver side and an awful game on Calgary side
When a game is one-sided like that, explanations from both sides are easy

Man the LEAFS *** Censored ***!!

*** Censored ** man they sensored s uck

Haha, what a boring game

zzzz......
They want Tavares so badly?

I am starting to think that your Ducks want Hedman as well

Euh... no...

hahaha good one Phoen|x!

Anaheim 3 - Toronto 2 (SO) Loser today Geoff

What a game... nothing very spectacular on both sides yesterday. A game where Anaheim was outshot, but found a way to win... and from a Toronto point of view, found a way to lose

In the third period, how Anaheim cannot manage a single shot on net against Toskala? Toronto's defense is awful and yet, no shot? Pathetic Ducks...

And what's the idea of pulling out Toskala for CuJo in the shootout? Toskala saved the day a couple of times. CuJo was the first surprised about that move...

And, if he would have won, CuJo would had the win? How can you do that to a goaltender? Now, CuJo has the loss... so it backfired on Wilson, but Toskala would had loss the win, if it happened right

Yesterday's CuJo stats: No shot faced, no minute played, no save and... a loss

I truly don't understand this kind of move... what a way to lose faith in your players

Shadowjoe wrote:

Yesterday's CuJo stats: No shot faced, no minute played, no save and... a loss

I just heard that on SportsCenter.

Finally, you are watching a decent sport show

Phoen|x wrote:

Shadowjoe wrote:

Yesterday's CuJo stats: No shot faced, no minute played, no save and... a loss

I just heard that on SportsCenter.
Finally, you are watching a decent sport show

I don't watch anything besides hockey and Simpsons

But, seriously, how can the NHL accept this move? The goaltender should at least play in the game, not only in the shootout... It's like a team that would place an injured player on their lineup, not making him play, and wait to send him for the shootout. That's ridiculous, as he did nothing to take part in the game. The goaltender that ended the overtime should be the shootout goaltender on my opinion

Well each time a coach tried this strategy, he ended up with a bad result.

Another fun fact, from the CGY-WSH game yesterday :

The Capitals had a 9 minutes powerplay !...and did not scored

A 9 minute PP?
How did that happened?
No wonder why they lost the game... half a period a man over, and can't score...

Bourque tried to start a fight but his opponent kneeled down

He got a 5 minutes for fighting + a double minor

Ovechkin is goaless in his last four games. No wonder why the powerplay struggles...and Theo got beaten by another weak shot

Phoen|x wrote:

Bourque tried to start a fight but his opponent kneeled down
He got a 5 minutes for fighting + a double minor
Ovechkin is goaless in his last four games. No wonder why the powerplay struggles...and Theo got beaten by another weak shot

That's what I don't understand... in any sport, you can't fight alone...

When the opponent doesn't want to fight, it's roughing, not fighting

This is a dumb call... for giving a major for fighting, both players need to drop their gloves. If one doesn't drop them, it's a minor for roughing

How much time do you see a major for fighting on one side only?

Well maybe I am wrong.

It was a 5 minutes major, maybe not for fighting.

Could be part of the new rules.

Maybe you are not wrong... you know how refs are consistent when calling a penalty

nah, you get a penalty from trying to engage in a fight and your opponent turns you down, in this case, you really were alone that wanted to fight since you were turned down...

DvOLUTiON wrote:

nah, you get a penalty from trying to engage in a fight and your opponent turns you down, in this case, you really were alone that wanted to fight since you were turned down...

How much time did we saw that? I can count it on my left-hand's fingers
And wanted to fight and fighting are two separate things in my mind though

First time I see it happen actually